Author: Neil Shah

  • bp targets Upstream growth after best exploration year in a generation

    bp targets Upstream growth after best exploration year in a generation

    Ariel Flores, SVP Capital Development, Upstream, steering bp’s global exploration and reservoir development, sat down with Edison TV to explain why the oil major’s growth story is gathering pace, and where the next barrels are coming from.

    In the second of Edison TV’s deep dives into bp (LSE:BP.), Executive Director Neil Shah put the questions that matter most to investors weighing the group’s upstream ambitions: is the growth plan working, where is the resource going to come from, and what difference is technology really making? Across the conversation, Ariel Flores, a 27-year bp veteran laid out a confident, numbers-backed case.

    “It’s a great proposition, one that is simpler, stronger, more valuable across our oil and gas portfolio,” Flores said, summing up the pitch he believes should bring investors back to the story.

    A Growth Plan That Is Delivering

    bp set out its stall at its 2025 capital markets update, promising to grow the upstream after years in which the division had taken a back seat. A year on, Flores says delivery has matched the rhetoric. “It’s gone very well since our capital markets update in 2025,” he told Shah, pointing to 96% plant reliability and a base business “performing well.”

    The numbers behind the momentum are specific. Seven of ten major projects are now online, contributing towards 150,000 barrels of additional production, while a final investment decision on the next wave of projects should add a further 250,000 barrels of oil equivalent at peak. bp’s reserve replacement ratio reached 90% in 2025, keeping the group on track for its aspiration of 100% by 2027.

    Cost discipline underpins the story. Operating efficiency is at “historic highs,” Flores said, with lifting costs running at around $6 per barrel of oil equivalent. A divestment programme aimed at strengthening the balance sheet is “going well,” and the organisation is moving towards a simpler upstream–downstream structure designed to cut cycle times and sharpen capital allocation. “Quality through choice features as we grow the hopper,” he said — bp’s shorthand for funding only the projects that clear a high value bar.

    The Best Exploration Year In A Generation

    If resource longevity has been the market’s nagging worry, 2025 went a long way to answering it. Flores did not undersell the headline: “I’ll start with the biggest discovery bp’s made in 25 years, our Bumerangue field in Brazil.” He described it as a “world-class structure” in a well-established basin, with the drill ship now on bp’s books and an appraisal programme to follow the Tupinamba well.

    Bumerangue was far from alone. bp logged a further 11 discoveries during the year: four gas finds in Egypt offering fast cycle times to first gas through existing infrastructure; the Frangipani discovery in Trinidad, earmarked for fast-tracking into existing LNG-linked facilities; successes at Capricornus and Volans across Angola and Namibia; and two further discoveries near existing infrastructure in the Gulf of America. “These all provide short cycle time, fast turnaround opportunities,” Flores said, “and that will lead to an accretive outlook to our plan as it relates to free cash.”


    The 2026 programme keeps the drill bit busy, with the Tupinamba well in Brazil and an “exciting” Conifer well in the Gulf of America towards year-end that could be tied back to the Kaskida project now under construction.

    Sweating Capital Already In The Ground

    Alongside the drill bit, bp has been buying its way to more resource through access deals that lean on infrastructure it already owns. Flores pointed to the Kirkuk opportunity in northern Iraq — built on bp’s delivery track record in the south at Rumaila — plus a prospect in Karabakh that would feed existing ACG infrastructure in partnership with SOCAR, and new gas access in India aimed at keeping existing facilities full.

    “All these provide for exciting, accretive opportunities,” he said, “because it’s harnessing capital that’s already deployed.”

    AI Moving “At Pace” Across The Upstream

    Perhaps the most forward-looking section of the interview concerned technology. bp is leaning on partnerships with Palantir, NVIDIA, AWS and Databricks to attack two fronts at once: stripping out cost by automating repetitive tasks, and squeezing more barrels from existing fields.

    On the subsurface, new NVIDIA GPUs in bp’s Houston computing centre are transforming seismic imaging. “This is allowing for processes to move from four times to 10 times to 50 times increase in productivity,” Flores said, letting more complex algorithms converge into sharper images and, ultimately, better-targeted wells and infill developments.

    On the drilling side, an AI-driven “offset well analyzer” now screens hundreds of well trajectories in minutes — work that “would take months in some cases to plan” — to identify the most cost-competitive, safe path to a target. Pulling it together through reservoir simulation and integrated asset modelling on a Palantir Foundry backbone, Flores argued, is “enhancing quality of product, shortening cycle times, improving the cost base” and, crucially, lifting recovery from capital already deployed.

    The Investment Case

    Asked the blunt question — why invest in bp? — Flores returned to the theme of focus and momentum carried from 2025 into 2026. The targets set out at the capital markets day for a 2027 outturn are “very well underpinned,” he said, supported by what he called a “rich hopper of organic opportunities” and 23 years of resource that is “both commercially and economically viable.”

    “It’s coming together nicely in the new upstream,” Flores concluded, “and we look forward to updating the market as we continue to progress our resources.”

    The full conversation is available on ADVFN and Edison TV.

  • Greggs – executive interview

    Greggs – executive interview

    In our interview with Richard Hutton, CFO of Greggs (LSE:GRG), he discusses the general trading backdrop, highlighting that while the business has outperformed a challenging market, negative volumes reflect broader consumer weakness rather than any loss of its value-led positioning, and outlined how it is responding operationally. The discussion also addressed suggestions of ‘Peak Greggs’, with management reiterating confidence in the group’s long-term growth potential through continued estate expansion, product development and daypart opportunities, albeit with a more balanced approach to new store openings as it weighs near-term returns against the opportunity to gain market share. Richard also covered efficiency savings delivered in FY25 and the scope for further opportunities, alongside commentary on slightly lower-than-expected capex in the coming years, with the peak capital investment cycle behind it. Looking ahead, the outlook for limited profit growth in FY26 in the absence of a consumer recovery was discussed as well as an update on cost inflation and potential commodity risks in light of recent geopolitical developments. Finally, we explored the potential impact of GLP-1 drugs, including the work undertaken to understand the trend and how product development is evolving in response, highlighting both the risks and opportunities for Greggs.

  • Why are governments and tech companies suddenly interested in small nuclear reactors?

    Why are governments and tech companies suddenly interested in small nuclear reactors?

    The world needs a constant supply of electricity to reach net-zero targets. Renewable energy sources provide part of the solution. Nuclear reactors run regardless of weather conditions, with lower carbon emissions than hydrocarbons, but traditional nuclear plants have become notorious for delays and cost overruns. Small modular reactors (SMRs) promise to de-risk the cost overruns and delays through factory production methods. Given the growth in AI infrastructure, large technology companies are already interested in SMRs.

    Google has partnered with Kairos Power, Amazon has invested in X-energy and Microsoft has secured output from a restarted reactor. These companies need vast amounts of reliable electricity for data centres. Governments see SMRs as essential for energy security while meeting climate commitments. The scale of interest is substantial: the global SMR pipeline has grown 65% since 2021 to reach 22 gigawatts of planned capacity, requiring $176bn in total investment according to Wood McKenzie.

    What advantages do SMRs offer over traditional nuclear plants?

    SMRs use standardised components built in factories and assembled on site, in contrast with traditional nuclear power plants, which consist of massive, bespoke reactors that take many years to construct. This modular approach should reduce construction time and cost. The reactors themselves are smaller (defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency as up to 300MW compared to 1,000MW plus for traditional plants), making them suitable for locations that cannot accommodate massive facilities. Some advanced designs use innovative cooling systems beyond conventional water-based technology. No Western company has completed a first-of-a-kind SMR, although China and Russia have operational reactors.

    Which reactor designs are leading the race to market?

    The SMR market resembles a global race with diverse technological approaches. Among proven water-cooled designs, GE Hitachi’s BWRX-300 leads deployment timelines, with four units under construction in Ontario, Canada, targeting first power by late 2029 and build times of 24–36 months. Rolls-Royce (LSE:RR.) leverages six decades of UK submarine reactor experience, with its design undergoing final UK regulatory review and selected for Czech deployment. NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) achieved first SMR technology US regulatory approval, though its Idaho Falls project was cancelled in 2023 due to cost overruns.

    More experimental designs have attracted substantial backing: Kairos Power began constructing its Hermes demonstration reactor in 2024, becoming the first US Gen IV reactor to enter build phase, with Google’s investment supporting its molten salt technology for 2030 deployment. X-energy plans the sector’s most ambitious rollout – over 5GW by 2039 – with Amazon backing its high-temperature, gas-cooled design. TerraPower’s sodium-cooled fast reactor with integrated energy storage, supported by Bill Gates, began demonstration construction in 2024. Westinghouse Electric (NYSE:WEC) is developing both the eVinci microreactor and the AP300 SMR, drawing on decades of nuclear expertise.

    BWX Technologies (NYSE: BWXT) positions itself as a critical supplier of nuclear components and fuel across multiple designs. Terra Innovatum Global (NASDAQ: NKLR) focuses on micro reactors, using widely available low-enriched uranium fuel and off-the-shelf components, with supply chains ready to construct its first SOLO reactor by 2027, pending US regulatory approval. This technological diversity reflects different approaches on the optimal balance between proven reliability and advanced performance.

    Are SMRs economically competitive with renewables and gas?

    SMRs must achieve levelised costs of electricity between €52 and €119 per megawatt-hour to compete with other baseload energy sources under current market conditions, according to Arthur D. Little analysis. These targets face stark competition: the International Energy Agency estimates standalone solar at $30.43/MWh and onshore wind at $36.92/MWh, though offshore wind reaches $120.51/MWh. Advanced nuclear currently sits at $63.10/MWh. Rolls-Royce targets below £70/MWh for its design. The economics depend critically on achieving standardisation benefits through volume production –requiring 30 to 50 units of standardised designs to unlock economies of scale. First-of-a-kind projects consistently face cost overruns, making next-of-a-kind deployments essential for proving commercial viability. Without synchronised supply chains and early manufacturing investment, projected time and cost advantages remain theoretical. The challenge intensifies as wind and solar scale rapidly, though their intermittent nature and lack of affordable large-scale storage create opportunities for reliable baseload alternatives. Investment decisions hinge on whether the industry can transform from custom-built projects to mass-produced standardised components, escaping nuclear’s historical pattern of delays and budget overruns.

    What are the biggest obstacles to widespread SMR deployment?

    Regulatory frameworks for SMRs remain fragmented, with each country requiring separate certification processes, reducing the benefits of standardisation. There are supply chains constraints, particularly for specialised fuel and components. In addition, a global skills shortage in nuclear engineering limits how quickly projects can proceed. Most fundamentally, no Western company has yet proven the SMR concept works commercially at scale. Until a first-of-a-kind reactor operates successfully in the West, demonstrating both technical performance and cost competitiveness, the technology remains unproven. This creates a dilemma: progress requires investment, yet investment requires proof. Government support and large corporate partnerships have become essential precisely because private capital alone will not bridge the financing gap.

    This article is part of a series from Edison Explains which looks to break down complex investment topics into clear, practical insights. If you would like any future topic covered please leave a comment for the Edison team.